Ban to be or not to be…

guiltRumors said  that all accounts (forum and game) of the authors of this blog will, be ban soon, because vennus wrote the post ” Acclaim secret base : India”. We expected a reaction like this from someone who does not know how to manager the turns of things. All I can say is : “we all are ready”.

Till now, my premium account was not baned, but I wait for it. I already took ss of all coins transactions from my account, all the money that I spend are show in there . If Historian will order to ban our accounts he will breach the ToS and before a lawsuit we will start complain in a petition form at California Gov, Department of Consumers Affairs.

http://www.postimage.org/image.php?v=aV1f4mui

Historian needs to understand that besides Acclaim rules, who he abuse at his will, outside virtual space, we have the law. He will have to explain to his  superiors why Acclaim will be under investigation by the departments of the state gov. I suggest if he orders the GMs  to do it, GMs should take a ss of the order, because if the situation will be worst, he will try take his hands of it and pass the guilt to the GMs who will do it.

Advertisements

26 responses to “Ban to be or not to be…

  1. this guy, Historian acts and thinks like a kid. he believes if he will ban you, you all will shut up. i think you all know more than you wrote on this blog and that will bring Historian doom days.acting like this will make him a lousy game manager.

  2. I can’t wait for the new movement. If he will ban you guys, the fight will become more aggravating and more things will get reveal. This is good for the community. You have nothing to lose, juts to fight.

    California Gov, Department of Consumers Affairs. Can you put the petition on blog before you send it ? I want to know how looks like. Nobody know, but I may need one in the future.

  3. Almighty Historian hit the bottom line this time. I hope you all will sue Acclaim and he will stop with this stuffs against players. What vennus wrote can be proven. To have a game ban for using your mind and research for the community sake is out of question. I hope he will break the TOS and see some action.

  4. My god you are just pathetic. Did you even READ the Term of Service?

    Acclaim can ban you at any time for any reason. And I’d like to see all your non-American asses collectively go to Los Angeles to file your Law Suit

    http://phpbb.acclaim.com/acclaim/viewtopic.php?p=6#6

    10. DENIAL OF ACCESS

    Acclaim, for any reason and at its sole discretion, may decide that any person shall be denied access to any part of the Acclaim site or Games. The sending of an e-mail notice, the posting of a notice on the forums (such as a notification of an account being banned in the forums), or the posting by Acclaim of a notice on the account used by a person who is subject to the denial shall constitute complete and sufficient notice of the denial. By agreeing to these Terms of Service, you agree to cease and desist immediately from any attempt to access the site upon issuance of a denial. If you do not cease and desist, you hereby consent to an injunction to be entered against you by a court of competent jurisdiction, as provided herein, permanently enjoining you from attempting to access the Acclaim site.

    In the event that a user threatens legal action against Acclaim, its respective officers, directors, employees, affiliates, licensors, representatives, third party providers and their agents the players account will be suspended until such time as the matter is resolved.

    • who says you need to go to LA to lawsuit Acclaim? you need to hire a lawyer from LA, nothing much. he can represent you, you just give him money.

      Losers you are really pathetic, not the rest.

      • True Chick, we don’t need to go to California, L.A. to sue Acclaim. We will hire a lawyer from LA to represent us. As long we are not witness, we don’t need to go. The lawyer is the representative, he can do all the papers.

        Losers, Acclaim will tell that to the California Gov, Department of Consumers Affairs and the Court of Law. When it is about money, we deal with prejudice.

    • As I understand sedbona said Historian is breaching the TOS from commercial point of view. What you quote is useless. I think she is right, a premium account is about money.

      • What TOS from commercial?

        Read people.

        Acclaim, for any reason and at its sole discretion, may decide that any person shall be denied access to any part of the Acclaim site or Games.

        Not much wiggle room there.

        Oh and did you read the Terms of Sale?

        http://phpbb.acclaim.com/acclaim/viewtopic.php?t=18

        REFUND POLICY
        All Item sales are final. Your unused Acclaim Coins are refundable should you decide to permanently close your Account (Note: you will lose the game characters and all items in all the games you are playing). Send email at contact@acclaim.com from the email addresses of your Account to request the refund. Awarded Acclaim Coins are non-refundable. If you are banned for breaking the Rules of Conduct, you will not receive a refund until you are restored if at all to an active player account.

        Did you catch that?

        If you are banned for breaking the Rules of Conduct, you will not receive a refund until you are restored if at all to an active player account.

        So, we have Vennus here threatening a lawsuit, which could get the account banned. Smart, very smart.

        And I got to tell you. You people sure do like to pat each other on the back. 90% of the comments are you talking to each other. I think I see maybe 10 to 15 unique people here. I guess as long as you think you can make a difference you will keep trying.

        Funny that you can’t seem to drum up much support.

      • Commercial law. TOS needs to respect it.

        “If you are banned for breaking the Rules of Conduct, you will not receive a refund until you are restored if at all to an active player account.

        So, we have Vennus here threatening a lawsuit, which could get the account banned. Smart, very smart.”

        Don’t quote something you don’t understand. Did I signed the TOS ? sedbona always said and it is written that a contract is valid when it is signed in written form. The lawyer will plead for this aspect, like many others did. I will ask refunding with interest all my money and money for psychical damage.

        Threatening is speaking my mind? This is absurd. I have freedom of speech to say what is in my mind. I told Acclaim what I will do, it is not threat. Also Acclaim can suspend the account on the lawsuit period of time, but I don’t care if they will ban me first.

        Acclaim rules you say ? They never respect them, I have many proofs in this sense. Acclaim must respect the law not their invented rules.

        “I think I see maybe 10 to 15 unique people here. I guess as long as you think you can make a difference you will keep trying.”

        I will, no worry. I am not like you a Loser.

      • you are not a lawyer in commercial law Losers. if you keep quoting from TOS and Terms of Services you will gain something?you can quote but you can’t interpret it. the lawyer will know what to do in the Court. everything can be put to ground. Acclaim rules don’t have law power and this say all.

        ‘Acclaim, for any reason and at its sole discretion, may decide that any person shall be denied access to any part of the Acclaim site or Games.’

        yes, they can according to what they wrote, but the player can contest this in the Court.

        ‘Not much wiggle room there.’

        yes it is. if Acclaim said they baned my account for hacking and the end I will prove it is false, their lost… were so many cases when players were unbaned after others investigations.

        ‘If you are banned for breaking the Rules of Conduct, you will not receive a refund until you are restored if at all to an active player account.’

        rules you say? no law power.

        try more next time Losers. if Acclaim wrote something that does not mean i can sit down and accept it if i know it is against the real law and harms me.

      • Debating ToS? The point of the lawyer is that. You give him the equation he will solve it.

  5. Acclaim may have rules, but that does not mean their rules are in total accord with the real life law.Only the future can tell us in this case what will happen. From my point of view Historian encourages this behavior and is putting fire in Acclaim house.

  6. Don’t you think your taking this a bit too far? .
    It’s just a game after all. If you spent so much money on it don’ you think it’s your own fault for getting too far into it?
    I cant see a point of why a lawcase would be involved for a few avatars on a computer screen.
    No doubt lots of you are gonna get mad at this post.
    Just something to think about..

    • I am not mad because you voice your opinion, I can agree or disagree. It is not so simple as you think it is. Yes, it is about avatar and avatars money which makes the business . When money comes into this transaction, the thing are getting bigger. Also, yes, you spend your money, but when you are ban because X wants so, “at his will”, this is a way to defend yourself. You try to recover what you lost because of a harmful and injustice measure.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s